Rhetorical Analysis: Straight from the heart, does it get
the job done
In reading Tom Collins commentary on Marie Fatayi-Williams
speech I find myself thinking he did both good and bad. Firstly, let us start
with the good.
Tom had made some very astute observations about the speech
and used many kinds of persuasion techniques and context lexical ties. As I was
reading the article there was one paragraph particularly meaningful to me,
paragraph number six.
Tom writes, “Her words are as free from hatred as they are
free from self-interest; it is clear that no man can give her her heart’s
desire- her son.” He is giving a perfect example of the strong pathos use in
Marie’s speech. This woman has almost certainly lost her son yet appeals to all
of us hearing her voice; senseless violence gains no victory and what cause
could someone have that is solved by the loss of life. At a time when most
would be angry at the world, demanding justice, she appeals to our emotions to
help her find her son and stop the violence. Tom summed that up in one line.
Lastly if there was one thing I did not like about his
analysis, it was too lengthy. Every paragraph was good and had meaning, but it
was so long I fear it lost most people. In his revision process he may want to
trim down unnecessary rhetoric not needed to get across his meaning.